M&E and improving: changing the status quo
The third in a short series of blogs from M&E consultant Nigel Simister which tackle learning and accountability within organisational […]
M&E and improving: the key features
The second in a short series of blogs from M&E consultant Nigel Simister which tackle learning and accountability within organisational […]
The M&E of advocacy…not another list of challenges
By Sarah Rose. Monitoring and evaluating advocacy is hard work, and most advocacy professionals are all too familiar with issues […]
M&E and improving: the spin chain
The first in a short series of blogs from M&E consultant Nigel Simister which tackle learning and accountability within organisational […]
Funders’ Collaborative for Children: a formative evaluation
INTRAC undertook a two-year formative evaluation of the Funders’ Collaborative for Children (FCFC) taking place between 2011 and 2013. While […]
Impact study of GIZ’s Northern Uplands Integrated Rural Development Project (NU-IRDP) in Laos
GIZ’s five-year Northern Uplands Integrated Rural Development Project in Laos came to a close at the end of 2015. INTRAC […]
Longitudinal Evaluation of EveryChild’s Responsible Exit Process
EveryChild was a UK international development charity, which closed in September 2016. In 2012, the organisation took the decision to […]
Praxis Paper 23. Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building: Is it really that difficult?
Few doubt the importance of capacity building in the modern era, and few would deny that effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is needed to support this work. Nevertheless, the monitoring and evaluation of capacity building is as much a challenge now as it was two decades ago. This paper examines both theory and current practice, and discusses some of the key barriers to progress.
M&E Paper 5: The Challenges of Monitoring and Evaluating Programmes
This paper first attempts to present some clarity in understanding the different uses of the term ‘programme’, and then uses the different types of programme to demonstrate the issues that are thrown up for monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
M&E Paper 2: Dealing with the Dilemmas in Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building
This paper highlights seven big questions that create dilemmas for and can often paralyse monitoring and evaluating of capacity building.
M&E Paper 1: Monitoring Flexible Funding: Navigating the challenges
This paper examines the debate that has emerged around the problems encountered in funding flexibly whilst trying to meet the demands for more results-based grant management .
OPS 47. Mapping the Terrain: Exploring Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma Programming in an Enlarged European Union
This paper provides an overview of the monitoring and evaluation strategies adopted at multiple levels of governance by various stakeholders […]